As is typical for the class, the Live View autofocus is slow and cumbersome as well, and the full-time autofocus in video performs about the same as other dSLRs - it can focus, but it doesn't stick and pulses on unmoving objects. ![]() But in suboptimal conditions you can feel the kit lens moving more slowly. It's smart enough to not hunt when you go for that second shot of the same subject and fine in good light. The autofocus occasionally feels more sluggish than the numbers would indicate, however. Continuous shooting runs at about 3.9fps, which should be good enough for most hobbyist photographers. Two sequential shots take roughly 0.5 - 0.6 second, depending upon whether you're shooting raw or JPEG, bumping up to 0.9 second if the flash fires. ![]() In dim light that rises to about 0.5 second also typical and pretty good. Its shot lag - focusing and shooting - in good light takes about 0.3 second, which is fast but now typical for its class. It's fast enough at powering on and shooting at less than 0.3 second. ![]() It's still no rocketship, however, compared with models like the SLT-A37. While I'd consider the photo quality comparison with the D3100 debatable, the D3200's performance is definitely better than its predecessor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |